> I'd like for you to reassess that conclusion about the practical, > every-day applicability of the IIH exercises. I guess I would clarify by saying that I don't deny the everyday applicability of the IIH exercises; perhaps only that, as you put it, the format of the presentation is described as setting aside a special time for it. I certainly don't stop my practice when I stop my meditation. But perhaps the reason I tend to frame things this way is that, as I indicated, I tend to have difficulty with slowing down, relaxing, and becoming aware of myself when I'm involved in mundane things. It's a big challenge for me. Spiritual development is definitely not a separate realm but it sure would be simpler if it were. > Well, this work does demand that you change those habits that don't > serve you. As for connecting with your partner, perhaps you could > negotiate an agreement that at the beginning of your meal you will spend > a few moments focused upon the impregnation of your food and then, when > that's done, you switch to your normal connecting, etc. Periodically > during your meal, remember that you're eating food that has been > impregnated with a specific idea and purpose. As you become more > proficient at impregnating your food, this becomes less and less > problematic. My question would be, is such a compromise okay to do ... Doesn't Bardon say to stop any reading or conversation? Is this an all-or- nothing practice, am I not shortchanging myself if I do a little at a time? Or maybe starting with a little at a time is better than nothing. Well thanks for answering my questions Rawn. David