Dear Rawn, You said, "There will actually be a greater moral commonality between two astrally Equilibrated individuals than two who are not and who therefore rely upon an external moral code, be it cultural or religious." You used the world "commonality". Can I conclude from this that morality of two Equilibrated individuals will not necessarily be INDENTICAL, since they both have different internal truths? Thanks, David --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> wrote: > Dear David, > > >> "At birth we possess an essential Equilibrium based upon our specific > maturity of spirit. In other words, the astral Elements reflect > precisely the mental influx of our own Individual Self." If I have > understood you correctly than it means that what I am now (i.e. my > personality) is the result of all the previous incarnations of my > Individual Self, plus my life experiences at the present incarnation (as > David :-), doesn't it? << > > My comment was directed specifically at the moment of birth, but yes, as > one grows, life experiences begin to alter the essential Equilibrium one > is born with. > > >> Does it also mean that on the birth-day of my next incarnation my > Equilibrium will be the same as on my day of death? << > > No. After physical death, the astral personality that has developed > over the incarnation dis-integrates. When the astral dis- integration is > complete, the spirit rises to the level of the mental plane that > corresponds with the maturity of the Individual Self. The astral body > that forms upon re-birth reflects the maturity of the *Individual Self*, > not that of the previous incarnation's astral personality. > > >> Finally, what role do genes play in all this? Are they simply the > physical expression of our Spiritual Maturity? We tend to resemble our > parents in terms of character traits; does it mean that there is some > kind of a correlation between the spirit maturity of children and > parents? << > > Our genetic inheritance is a manifestation of karma and the lessons we > must learn during incarnation. In this sense they do have to do with > one's spiritual maturity but often this connection doesn't appear > "logical" For example you can't say that a person born with a genetic > defect is necessarily spiritually immature. In fact, quite the opposite > might be true considering that the lessons brought by genetic defects > can often require a great amount of spiritual maturity to live with. > > >> You also said that, "A person who has not achieved the Elemental > Equilibrium bases their morals upon external input -- from their > parents, loved ones, church, society in general, etc. But the > Equilibrated individual bases their morality upon inner directives > alone." What about two Equilibrated individuals? The only thing they > will SURELY have in common is their independent foundation of morality > upon their internal selves. The nature of this morality will, however, > depend on the specific maturity of their spirit. Am I right? << > > There will actually be a greater moral commonality between two astrally > Equilibrated individuals than two who are not and who therefore rely > upon an external moral code, be it cultural or religious. The reason > for this greater commonality is two-fold: Number one, when morality > arises from *internal* necessity, it is solid and no longer situational. > And number two, internally (i.e., spiritually) is where we share our > deepest degree of commonality. > > My best to you, > :) Rawn Clark > 26 Feb 2004 > rawnclark@n... > rawn@a... > http://www.ABardonCompanion.com > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis > http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe