You have certainly hit upon a conundrum. However, why does it matter?
From a hermetic perspective, we are all slivers of divinity, thereforeanything we create is imbued with the same divinity. It is a truism to say that the magickal world-view finds no contradiction between saying that an entity is both external to one's self and completely subjective. If someone says that it has to be one or the other, they have not fully embraced the idea of their own divinity, indeed, they are not living in a magickal paradigm.
Dualism is most assuredly does not encourage a magickal perspective.
Regards, Simon
From: "Daniel Gutmanas" <noxerus@...> Reply-To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com Subject: [BardonPraxis] Real vs. imagined communication Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:35:22 -0000
Dear group,
I've been thinking about this lately, and I could not find the answer in IIH nor figure it out myself. I'm rather confident that I'm just missing some important piece of information which will solve this puzzle for me, and yet it eluded me so far. It is only during grade IX and above that the practitioner can evoke true external intelligences and not just the contents of his psyche - bearing this in mind, how come the passive communications of grade V with one's HGA and the deceased is real and not just brought out of the psyche?
Thanks, Daniel