Re: [BardonPraxis] Re:Essential meaning

[Scott Andersen <sga_email@...>]

Dear Rawn,

Nice to hear from you. :)

Ditto!, I never ever left ;)


Essential meaning is the same for all who *directly* perceive it. Where
variation arises is in the *interpretation* of essential meaning. That
is when it becomes a subjective, personalized thing, but this is not
*direct perception*.

Ok, So to take the example of the plastic action figures in your other post 
about essential meaning, the figure of Godzilla; the essential meaning is, in 
this case, created in the artists mind as an idea or intention, a message or 
intent that he/she wanted to convey which results in the form of Godzilla?

The same could be said for the hunchback or any other figure, the essential 
meanings of these figures were created, were *supplied* by the mind of the 
artist?

But what about natural forms such as a rose or tree, where do their essential 
meanings originate? 

Since they are not the result of an idea in a persons mind like the Godzilla 
character or the hunchback character, where do their essential meanings 
originate from?

After reading the 'Gems of Akasha' response about essential meaning I can 
understand that it is the essential meaning that allows the manifestation and 
without the essential meaning there is no essence with which astral or physical 
matter can cling. Nature dresses according to the essential meaning the form in 
the astral density or both the astral and physical densities. 

But from where does the essential meaning of natural forms originate ( since 
these do not originate in the mind of man )?

Kind Regards,

Scott.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]