All, I have been working of late with the TMO exercises and have been finding them to be very useful, suprisingly so. However, I do have some questions, partly out of idle curiousity, partly to see what other people's viewpoints are on this subject. These questions probably have been asked in the past, and I simply missed them paging through prior posts. First, TMO reminds me quite a bit of the Middle Pillar exercise (MPE), although the lessons in TMO seem to be better developed than anything I've seen on the MPE (not that I've seen much on the MPE). For example, practicing the different levels of speech seems to be crucial to both exercises, but I never heard about this until coming to the TMO exercises. I read in some prior posting that TMO can take the place of the MPE, but I am finding them to be somewhat different and useful in different ways. Since they both use the same basic map of the human body (the Tree of Life with the Pillar of Mercy to the Left), they seem to be complementary to one another and fit together quite well. Now it has been said that doing different practices is fine, but it can also be problematic, especially if repeated practice can change one's inner body or bodies. While different systems can map the same truths, different maps one could imagine might interfere with one another or even contradict one another. This is not to say that one system is right or the other wrong, but that internally, each system is different. David Sheinkin in his "Path of the Kabbalah" compares it to nutritional programs: in program A, one might be told to eat cereal and beans but no milk; while in program B milk is essential but beans are forbidden. Both programs result in a healthy body. Each system may be effective so long as one operates within it. Once we start comparing or combining systems, we might put them into conflict with one another in ways that only experiences practicioners might see. I suppose this is a long, drawn out and complicated way of asking: should TMO and MPE be practiced together, and indeed, is it wise or unwise to explore other Hermetic techniques (for instance, the Kabbalistic Cross)? More generally, are there techniques that one would be ill-advised to practice along with Hermetics? Bardon gives many general principles, leaving the individual to fill it in as appropriate (for example, he advises daily physical exercise, but leaves it up to each individual to decide on what exercises to do). Secondly, brief questions reagarding TMO. Please know I am asking these questions for answers, and am not questioning TMO generally, which I find to be quite fantastic: 1. What is the difference between the I am ("ani") in TMO and the I am that I am ("eheyeh") in the MPE? Why the different words to establish Kether? 2. Why does TMO establish the center of Tifereth at the solar plexus, rather than the heart? Would it be unwise to focus it on the heart? Does it really make a difference? I am thinking at this point that Hermetics is a system where individuals draw on the same basic core of theory and techniques, and then develop them differently depending on each individual (summed up by the observation that on the Tree of Life, the Sefira are objective, but the paths are subjective). I am also thinking that the practices change and develop with the individual. However, I don't want to cut the heart out a technique when I haven't mastered it, but I don't want to arbitrarily limit myself either. Just for the record, this post was supposed to be much shorter. Thanks! mj