BardonPraxis Message Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

RE: Feminine / Masculine Balance


Message 02628 of 3835


Dear Regulus

Bardons regime starts even at Step one with an active seeding of Akasha
via Eucharistic magic. It's not as formal as ritual seeding, but I don't
see it as being passive, just understated.

Also, the emphasis within Bardons regime leans towards the fire element,
an active pole, with the type of concentration and will-training he expects of 
the
student.

I see his techniques as containing very masculine/active elements, just focused 
internally
onto the student themselves, rather than externally into the immediate world
around them.

Rather than feminine/passive, I actually see it as being quite masculine/active.
This may not be an accurate view, it may be completely neutral in its entirety,
but that's how I perceive his system at present.


R


-----Original Message-----
From: Regulus Magus [mailto:RegulusMagus@...]
Sent: 20 May 2004 19:26
To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BardonPraxis] Feminine / Masculine Balance


Good afternoon dear colleagues.

For some time I have been thinking about the Feminine / Masculine 
axis of polarity and about Balance. I have hesitated to bring this up 
for fear of causing offense where none is intended. Nevertheless a 
question not asked is wisdom forgone. So . . .

It seems to me that Hermetics as described in IIH and as discussed in 
this list is a little skewed towards the Feminine pole. Much of the 
emphasis is on meditation, passive observation of inner states, and 
learning "to be" in a higher sense of the concept. Although Bardon 
describes the actual doing of magick it doesn't seem to get as much 
emphasis as the more receptive exercises. Certainly on this list I 
don't read much about summoning power, casting spells, and making 
things happen out in the world - in other words, I don't hear much 
about the Masculine aspects of Hermetics.

Is the focus of our discussions out of balance or (perhaps) is the 
focus deliberately skewed towards the Feminine to compensate for a 
culture that favors the Masculine?

Sincerely, /RM/

P.S. Please note that I am talking about Feminine / Masculine in the 
esoteric sense - I'm not referring to specific traits of female / 
male members of the human species.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor   

ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=1294hs83c/M=295196.4901138.6071305.3001176/D=groups/S=1705077360:HM/EXP=1085165032/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6/*http://companion.yahoo.com>
 click here 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=295196.4901138.6071305.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2128215/rand=962412734>
 


_____ 

Yahoo! Groups Links


*       To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis/


*       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BardonPraxis-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
<mailto:BardonPraxis-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 


*       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 


Main Index | Thread Index