Dear 'setiamon', <sineadoconnorfan@y...> wrote: > I am still kind of confused about it because I don't see a train of > thought as something that you can be detached from because of the > fact that you're actively thinking it. I think Bardon wanted us to > get into a train of thought and just be aware of it and remember it. You replied: >> That makes much more sense then being absolutly detached from the train of thoughts, << While the analysis from someone who has not actually experienced the exercise might make more sense to you it is still, nonetheless, wrong. >> because when i detach myself from the thoughtpatterns they disappear, they dissolve so at some point the first excercise becomes the third if i take it as total detachment, << As I have said countless times: Observe *whatever* happens in your mind when you detach from participating in what transpires in your mind. If all thoughts cease because you have detached from participation, then observe *that*. When you are able to be detached and observe *whatever* happens for a span of at least 10 minutes, then you have "mastered" the exercise. It is a *very* simple exercise! My best to you, :) Rawn Clark 19 Dec 2004 rawnclark@... rawn@... http://www.ABardonCompanion.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe