Re: First 3 steps- questions-experience-clarification

["setiamon" <setiamon@...>]

That makes much more sense then being absolutly detached from the
train of thoughts,because when i detach myself from the
thoughtpatterns they disappear,they dissolve so at some point the
first excercise becomes the third if i take it as total detachment,i
think bardon meant that you should let you mind automate just retain
your "self" awareness,don't forget yourself.Although i must admit a
few times i have experienced a sudden altered state like my
concoussness is pulled outside the thoughtsphere,its like simple
floating above ones mind with a motionless observer
conciousness,without any attachment or identification,kinda like a
oobe where my own mind is like someone elses,another times i have
emerged from a deep trance or sleep and approuching my thinking mind
as if it were its own creature,this is something someone advanced has
to answer...
Rawn?


--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "sineadoconnorfan"
<sineadoconnorfan@y...> wrote:
> 
> I'm not really a fan of rationality and the rational mindset 
> either. As far as imagining images is concerned I can see how you 
> can have that without actively creating them, but not with verbal 
> thoughts which you actually have to personally say/think.
> 
> I am still kind of confused about it because I don't see a train of 
> thought as something that you can be detached from because of the 
> fact that you're actively thinking it. I think Bardon wanted us to 
> get into a train of thought and just be aware of it and remember it.
>