Does anyone have any possible insights on the relationship, if any, between the five Chinese (or Taoist) elements (metal, water, fire, earth, and wood) and the classic four elements (keeping in mind, of course, ether as well)? It seems that the Chinese elements represent an entirely different scheme of division, one which cannot simply be mapped onto or grafted with the more familiar four elements. But given its ancient heritage and widespread popularity, it would not seem right to simply write the five element theory off as a different approach for different people, there seems to be something as universal as the Chinese division as with the "western" division. Drawing simple analogies between the two doesn't seem to do the trick, it does appear that they are different in a more fundamental way. Further, does anyone have a grasp of the underlying principles that would inform a five-fold elemental division rather than a four- fold division? It seems that the four-fold division is saturated with the idea of polarity, and the rythmic flow of things between two poles. However, this polarity doesn't seem as sharp and crisp when applied to the Chinese elements; indeed, the relationship between the five elements seems more fluid, more slippery, more circular and less centered then when dealing with four elements.