Re: Karmic Releases

["Jason Paris" <jambay53@...>]

Hiya Rawn,

> Bardon was capable, *in certain circumstances*, of eliminating a 
disease from a person in such a way that it would not return, 
regardless of the person's karma. The implication of such an act is 
that the person must learn their karmic lesson in a different way 
(likely a more difficult way). <

Can I ask: how might one identify the lesson inherent in a physical 
ailment or dis-ease?

I realise this is highly subjective, but what might the sufferer of 
cancer, for example, infer as their lesson? And how might they know -
with accuracy - that they've discovered the *correct* lesson that 
was intended for them? Surely there's considerable guess-work at 
play?

One can immediately see cause and effect manifest in the Physical 
world (eg, cut my lip, blood appears). Yet I'm unsure how one 
accurately recognises *ethical* Karmic payback.

To use the obvious example: person A murders person B with a gun.

There are measurable, physical cause & effect relationships here: a 
trigger is pulled, a bullet it discharged; a bullet penetrates 
person B's body, a hole is created, etc etc etc.

But there's the *ethical* cause and effect too: Person A has 
commited an act of profound hate & disrespect upon Person B.

How might the effect from that *ethical* cause manifest in Person A's 
life? And how would Person A *know* with certainty (especially an 
incarnation or two later) that the present difficulties in their life 
are connected back to this act of murder?

And if they *can't* know, then how can they learn the lesson that 
Karma intends for them? How might they redeem this part of their 
Karma, and move forward?


All the best,

Jason