Many thanks, mj. To close this subject, the fact that I asked this question concerning the theory (as did others for other subjects) does not mean that I *limit* myself to theory, at the expenses of my practice :-) However, the experiences related by the other students showed me that I can limit my efforts on this side for a little while. With my best messages NB --- forestofsymbols <forestofsymbols@...> wrote: > > NB, > > > <<It might help if rather than thinking of these > > things in the abstract, you find some experiences > to > > tie them to, to make them real for yourself. >> > > > > Can you elaborate, please ? I'm interested in all > > possible ways to improve my meditations on the > > Elements - and the questions they raise. Thanks in > > advance. > > I can elaborate only a very little. I'm not so > far on this path > myself. > > It seems to me that the first rule of esoteric > study is to accept > nothing, verify everything. We could talk all day > about cats, their > shape, color, disposition and habits, but nothing > will teach you as > much about cats as actually seeing one, hearing one, > interacting with > one. When you speak of the Element Fire, what do you > mean? Have you > seen it, interacted with it, felt it, known it? What > experiences have > you had, physically, emotionally, and mentally could > you connect with > the vague concept of Fire? For me, Fire is hot and > expanding, > energetic. You can light a candle and watch it, feel > it, think about > it, observe yourself and see what feelings and > thoughts it inspires. > You can sit in the sun on a summer day, feel it, the > heat on the > skin, the jumpiness in the mind, the muscular > tension and discomfort > that comes. Watch yourself when you grow angry, you > can actually feel > the heat flash through your body and cloud your > mind. All of these > things will give you actual first hand experiences > that you can draw > on and tie to the abstract symbol of "Fire." For me, > this is all a > corollary from the exercises of the first step, > namely thought > observation. > > Hope this helps. > > mj > > --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, > Newbieonekenhobby > <newbieonekenhobby@y...> wrote: > > Dear forestofsymbols, > > > > Many thanks for your message. > > > > <<it sounds like you might be confusing the > elements > > (fire, water, earth, air, and ether) and the > levels > > (physical, astral, mental). >> > > > > I re-read my message, and I understand your > feeling > > :-). English is not my mother tongue (as you may > have > > guessed :-) and the following sentence, > particularly, > > could have been written more carefully : > > ----- > > does the "shaping" of the raw energy issued by > Fire > > take place at the Water level ? > > ----- > > What I meant was simply "is the raw energy issued > by > > Fire shaped by Water". > > In spite of my clumsly wording, I don't have the > > feeling I made a confusion between Elements and > Planes > > (...although physical corresponds to the Earth > > Element, astral to the Water Element, Mental to > the > > Fire Element etc., ... and knowing that Astral is > an > > intermediary between Mental and Physical. Aarghh. > > Just wanted to ensure I confused everybody :-) :-) > > > > Given the correspondance just mentionned above, I > was > > tempted to answer myself "yes" to my own question > > (does water give form to Fire). But I'm still not > > sure. > > > > The question I asked is valid for all planes, not > only > > the physical one. > > > > <<It might help if rather than thinking of these > > things in the abstract, you find some experiences > to > > tie them to, to make them real for yourself. >> > > > > Can you elaborate, please ? I'm interested in all > > possible ways to improve my meditations on the > > Elements - and the questions they raise. Thanks in > > advance. > > > > Greetings > > NB > > > > > > --- forestofsymbols <forestofsymbols@y...> wrote: > > > > > > Others may disagee, but it sounds like you > might > > > be confusing the > > > elements (fire, water, earth, air, and ether) > and > > > the levels > > > (physical, astral, mental). Further, it seems > that > > > you are also > > > confining the element "earth" to the physical > level > > > alone. It might > > > help if rather than thinking of these things in > the > > > abstract, you > > > find some experiences to tie them to, to make > them > > > real for yourself. > > > This was my own mistake as I've recently > discovered. > > > > > > mj > > > > > > > > > --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, > > > Newbieonekenhobby > > > <newbieonekenhobby@y...> wrote: > > > > Oops. Here are a few sentences I forgot to > > > include. > > > > > > > > I know that the actual *solidification* ("let > it > > > be > > > > done") takes place at the Earth Element - > > > > electromagnetic level. > > > > > > > > My question is not about this level: > > > solidification is > > > > distinct from shaping IMHO. My question is > really > > > > about the original "Intention/Design" : does > the > > > > "shaping" of the raw energy issued by Fire > take > > > place > > > > at the Water level ? > > > > > > > > May sound confusing (and confused) to the > other > > > > students. I apologize ...but I still need to > know, > > > > because till now I believed that Water was > > > > "shrinking", so to speak, something already > formed > > > and > > > > solidified at another level, but I did not > imagine > > > > that it was taking a role in the shaping > process. > > > > > > > > Ok. I'll stop worsening my case :-) > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > NB > > > > > > > > > > > > --- newbieonekenhobby <newbieonekenhobby@y...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > In Rawn's comments on IIH, I read in the > "Theory > > > > > Section": > > > > > > > > > > <<The magnetic Fluid *gives form* to the > > > Electric > > > > > force>> (emphasis > > > > > mine). > > > > > > > > > > Taking this literally, meaning that the > creation > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com