Dear Joa, > But I am in TOTAL disagreement with you when you say that the best > response is "to ignore the threat and not to get paranoid". Well, > I don´t believe that a person that has been threaten of death by > a dangerous person (an assasin, for example) has "paranoia". He has > REALLY a problem, and to ignore that can put in danger his own > life. If you ignore a problem when you really have a problem, then > you are doing the same thing that the ostrich: to hide your head > under the ground. I see how I misphrased my comment, but this is not what I meant. I wanted to say that I believe that most "psychic" attacks are the result of paranoia or fear, and that genuine "psychic" attacks are rather rare. I never said that you should not respond to a real attack - on the contrary, I think you should shield yourself from it. > >> "Instead of harming him, I think it is much >> preferred to neutralize his attack" > > Well, let´s suppose that a woman is mistreated by her husband > every day, physically and psychically. She informs on the police > her case, but the police is absolutely negligent with this case > (this is something very frequent in many parts of the world, > unfortunately, and many women die). > Well, could you say me what method must employ this woman > to "neutralize his attack"? Sincerely, I haven´t got very clear > how this woman could defend herself and those close to her (for > example, her children, who, in many occasions are victims of the > domestic violence too). The examples that I could put to you are > innumerable... Every such case (and unfortunately, I am aware that there are too many of them) is different. In some, the woman with her children can escape and move to her relatives, or some other safe haven, and completely cut off their previous life with the abusing husband. In many cases there does exist such an option, but the woman does not realize that she is being abused or that she should protect herself and her children. But I digress; the woman should most definitely protect herself from the abuse, with the means available to her. But, doing so should not entail harming the abusing husband out of revenge. For example, she might give him a sleeping pill, or tie him up, etc, and then run away. Such an action, although it did hurt him, was done out of necessity, and not out of revenge. If, on the other hand, that woman would tie her husband up and then kill him, it would already be revenge and "sense of justice", and not just necessity. In short, do whatever you can to protect yourself, but make sure your actions indeed do come from the need for protection, and not from the wish of revenge. I do not think there are as many "kill or be killed" situations as people think, and regarding those that do happen, I have no answer yet - I assume that for a true magician who already knows the nature of death and incarnation, the better action would be to let himself be killed in such an extreme situation, but I honestly don't know. Is the situation you discuss truly one where there is no other way to resolve it other than killing the aggressor? Is your thought regarding the use of black magic, aimed at protection, or at revenge? I think that Rawn summed it up very well in his post (as he usually does :). Sincerely, Daniel Gutmanas