Dear RM, Very helpful examples. Thanks! Dan :) --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Regulus Magus" <RegulusMagus@h...> wrote: > Interesting question Dan. I don't have any deep knowledge concerning > the issue at hand but let me contribute an example to help with the > discussion. > > Most of us cycle through good and bad moods. We like our jobs; we're > stressed by our jobs. We enjoy our families; our families drive us up > the wall. And so on. > > If you deliberately cultivate thought habits that support a positive > perspective - - looking for good things in bad situations, etc (I > know this sounds fluffy but it's just an example), then you can > become polarized towards the positive end of your mood polarity. The > rhythm will still be there but now you oscillate from "very positive" > to "mildly positive" instead of from positive to negative. If you are > very good at polarizing your mood you'd see a kind of "ceiling > effect" in which the entire range of your moods is so positive that > you would hardly see any change as your moods swing. . . and thus you > would have neutralized your rhythm. > > Similarly some of the worst dysfunctions I've ever seen have been in > families that have unconsciously polarized themselves towards the > negative. > > From the perspective of these examples, learning to polarize in this > way might actually be seen as a change that comes as a *consequence* > of learning a Karmic lesson. > > Sincerely, /RM/ > > > --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "danerebor" <hornedfox@h...> > wrote: > > How does the Kybalion's axiom "Rhythm may be neutralized by an > > application of the Art of Polarization" apply to Karma? > > > > If a hermeticist neutralized the mental effects of Rhythm, would > that > > interfere with his or her learning a karmic lesson? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan :)