Dan, might I suggest your question might receive a larger response on Mormon-Mystic ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mormon-mystic/ ). They're a friendly bunch, though their moderators do insist on courteous discourse. >From my perspective, Mormonism can readily adapt to truth where-ever it can be found; though members of the LDS church would probably be somewhat wary of anything described as "magic" or the "occult." I think it would be primarily a semantics problem: Mormons talk about "Gifts of the Spirit" not "psychic talents," about "Receiving the Second Comforter" not "Conversation with the Holy Guardian Angel," about "the Mysteries of Godliness" not "occult philosophy," etc. I'm a Bardon beginner. (I haven't really started IIH step one yet; I'm still reading my way through first, as Rawn suggests.) But I am a Mormon and would be happy to answer whatever questions I can. Owens wrote another piece called, "Joseph Smith Kabbalah: The Occult Connection" which is also available at http://gnosis.org/jskabb1.htm . The opposing Orthodox Mormon view was published here: ( http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=229 ) But those are really just two people's views, there's a huge diversity of opinion about lots of topics (as I'm sure you know) when it comes to Mormonism or Christianity or Religion in general. For what it's worth. Jason Richards ___Dan___ > Recently I read an article explaining the Hermetic influence on > Joseph Smith and Mormonism at http://gnosis.org/ahp.htm . I don't > have any personal experience with Mormonism, so I have a question for > anyone who does: how compatible is Bardonism and Mormonism? Do they > have similiar outlooks and practices? ===== Jason "One man cannot do right in one department of life whilst he is occupied doing wrong in any other department. Life is one indivisible whole." --Mahatma Gandhi __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail