Hi Tony, I've seen a few posts on the nature of thoughts and what constitutes mastery of step 1. The whole idea is not to say "that thought didn;t happen becasue I don't count it in #my# definition of the exercise", Bardon is very explicit - no thoughts maintained for 5 minutes. This means that even if something comes and is immediately dismissed, it is still a thought. With training, you are able to feel a precursor to a thought appearing as a feeling and automate blocks to prevent it from occurring. Mastery is obtained when there is no conscious awareness of any thought appearing for the full extent of the exercise. It is also useful to note that whereas 5 minutes is used as a benchmark, the idea is to be able to obtain this completely free state for an indefinite period; so if you struggle to keep 5 mins and say "phew, made it, mastered it!" then the "mastered it" wouldn't really be the case. Doing occasional one off tests like 10 mins or seeing how long it can be maintained will give you a geuine understanding of whether thought control has "really" been mastered. Having said that, if you can really make 5 mins (and have completed everything else in step 1)- you should go on to step 2, but be aware of the need to be able to maintain and increase empty states throuhgout future training. Regards, - Mark --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "allonby_anthony" <anthony@a...> wrote: > > > This is actually a practical question regarding Step 1, Mastery of > Thoughts. I can sit for 5 minutes and have 6-8 thoughts. Typically > these thoughts will be sentence like "be vigilant!" or "the trick is > not to follow the thought" i.e. comments or self-questions on my > progress. Lots of background noise pops up - voices, words, random > images, the occasional memory. I figure if I quash these and don't > pursue them, they don't count as a thought, so I don't count them on > my beads. So if an image of an eye (or anything) spontaneously pops > into my consciousness, and I dismiss it, I don't count it. In fact I > count only memories I pursue or sentences I let complete (and some of > them are pretty fast) as thoughts. Is this acceptable, or should I be > striving for complete blankness, with nothing emerging spontaneously? > Is this even possible? > > Thanks for any comment on this. > > Regards Tony W.