Thank you. :T:
From: "dato1848" <dato1848@...> Reply-To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com Subject: [BardonPraxis] Re: Earthly Ambitions Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:29:10 -0000
Dear Rawn,
Thank you for the prompt response.
Just to fully understand the meaning of your words, I would like to bring an hypothetical example of some one who did a very sincere, thorough examination of his self. He followed his inner truth, listened to his inner voice. The results were quite good, and he came up with over 200 bad traits which he then carefully assigned to every element. There was only one problem, he did not fully appreciate the negative impact that his vengfulness had on him and failed to include the trait in his "Black" Soul Mirror. This should not surprise us, as he was still in the very beginning of his spiritual path, and his senses were sometimes deceptive. With years of intensive work he managed to transform his negative traits in the mirror into positive ones. From his point of view, he became a very good human being, only that he still was quite vengeful, and anybody around him could testify this...
Now my question is, is he a balanced human being, only because from his point of view he is? If all that matters is our own truth and "Subjective vs. objective has no meaning here", this would imply that yes, because this is exactly what HIS Inner Voice tells him. Or am I wrong?
Also, do you think that I am complicating things too much here?
Thanks, David
--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> wrote: > Dear David, > > >> BUT since I am far from perfection, since my > senses are not fully developed and since I have very little > experience in life, I consider analysing and contemplating upon the > ideas of other people - who might raise points that I have not > thought about - as an integral part of my evaluation process. The > way I see it (and please correct me if you disagree), evaluation is > when I gather all the possible and available information from all > possible sources (including mine, my parents', the milkman's and the > taxi drivers'), and then make MY OWN conclusion about it. << > > Ordinarily, that's a fine sentiment but with the Mirror work, it's > inappropriate because this is not an intellectual process. The > evaluations of the Soul Mirror are instinctual and based upon an inner > knowing, not upon a thinking, weighing, etc. You *know* if a thing is > right or wrong for you, positive or negative. The Soul Mirror requires > this level of introspection (*inner*-examination) instead of just an > intellectualization. > > >> Since my senses are not fully developed, since my ability to judge > is limited, I am very likely to come to a very personal conclusion > about money, career or indeed any other topic, which from my own > perspective will be absolutely true and sincere (plus will have the > affirmation of my "inner voice"), but yet will be the total opposite > of the objective truth. << > > All that matters with the Soul Mirror is *your* truth. Not what any one > else thinks. *Your* truth. Subjective vs. objective has no meaning > here. > > My best to you, > :) Rawn Clark > 16 Feb 2004 > rawnclark@n... > rawn@a... > http://www.ABardonCompanion.com > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis > http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe