I find it rather interesting how one can, in the course of their path, reread sections of Bardon's material that they know by heart and suddenly notice, as if for the first time, a deeper meaning than what they'd previously ascribed to it. I was rereading the Theory section of IIH, keeping myself fresh and looking for new stuff to meditate on, when I noticed that Bardon says that human beings aren't the originators of their own thoughts, that the spirit acts as a receiver for the transmission of the concepts housed within the Akasha. Logically thinking, with the Akasha principle in mind, that makes perfect sense - but why is it that some people only think of some things and not others? How does this explain, say, the mental tendencies and habits of a scientist and a mystic, if their thoughts come from the same source? My guess is simply that people interpret the information in ways that they prefer (but then where does "preference" come from?). I'd love to hear others' input on this.